@Wei Dai I saw a comment by you sharing some LLM output that was then removed. That’s fine, but just as a matter of LLM epistemic hygiene, I trust LLM output to be fair and balanced much more when the person also shares a link to the full prompting history for the chat, and not just the output.
(Once in the past I was shared on an LLM output that had very biasing content earlier on, where the LLM was somewhat syconphantically agreeing with the author, but that part was not shared with me.)
(I’ve been wanting to advocate for this norm more broadly, so am just taking this opportunity to bring it up.)
@Wei Dai I saw a comment by you sharing some LLM output that was then removed. That’s fine, but just as a matter of LLM epistemic hygiene, I trust LLM output to be fair and balanced much more when the person also shares a link to the full prompting history for the chat, and not just the output.
(Once in the past I was shared on an LLM output that had very biasing content earlier on, where the LLM was somewhat syconphantically agreeing with the author, but that part was not shared with me.)
(I’ve been wanting to advocate for this norm more broadly, so am just taking this opportunity to bring it up.)