Here at lesswrong we are probably all good Solomonoff inductors and so tend to reject collapse.
Isn’t that hindsight bias?
I wonder how many Less Wrongers would be preferring Copenhagen by now if Eliezer originally argued for it...
I thought collapse was extremely unlikely before Overcoming Bias existed, as I strongly suspect did most less wrongers who had thought seriously about the question.
And I wonder how many people would have lost interest in lesswrong(OB) if he had.
Isn’t that hindsight bias?
I wonder how many Less Wrongers would be preferring Copenhagen by now if Eliezer originally argued for it...
I thought collapse was extremely unlikely before Overcoming Bias existed, as I strongly suspect did most less wrongers who had thought seriously about the question.
And I wonder how many people would have lost interest in lesswrong(OB) if he had.