Private insurance approaches to universal healthcare seem like the only universal healthcare policy formulation that doesn’t subsidise and therefore incentivise poor health decisions. Therefore, the primacy of my justice ethics would support that or non-universal health care policy formulations. However, I don’t know if evidence supports or opposes the execution of that perverse incentive in actual human behaviour and whether complex other factors (e.g increased productivity of the subsidised risk takers?) sufficiently compensates individuals who are making legitimate, egoistic decisions or better (prosocial). Anyone know what the evidence says, preferably with an indication of the strength of evidence so others evidence can be synthesised appropriately?
How do I work out whether an ethical duck farm is a profitable venture?
Say this with me ‘I will cognitively reframe and restructure the knowledge of antecedents and determinants of negative, inadvertable consequences because cognitive behavioural therapy actually works.’
I’m interested in things people might expect or seek reactions after disclosing information or asking a question. What kind of reaction are you expecting in response to whatever you comment to this reply?
Do you believe the affective fallacy is a legit fallacy? I don’t, but I think attitudes to the fallacy would be a good correlate of attitudes to my writing.
Strategically, do you think more like a naval admiral, or a pirate captain?
By taxing tobacco above the Ramsey rate up to Pigovian rates it is sacrificing government tax revenue (by cannibalising the elasticity of demand) for public health gains that can be gained in other ways (eg by tobacco licenses), but that wouldn’t that reduce demand too due to less consumption. That’s because even though tobacco tax revenue is high it doesn’t match the costs externalised on the health care system.
Counterintuitive relevant fact: Adam Smith support Pigovian taxes
‘Sugar, rum and tobacco are commodities which are no where necessaries of life, which are become objects of almost universal consumption, and which are therefore extremely proper subjects of taxation.’
Adam Smith. An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations, 1776i
I recently almost asked someone if they had a strategy....for what amounted to the formulation fo their startup’s strategy, meta addiction diagnosed!
Maybe it’s because I’m compulsive. Maybe it’s because I’m clingy to motivational videos, maybe it’s because I’m a gambling addict. So, I’ve got off the hedonic treadmill. How? A mindblowing attitude adjustment on desire. This culls my impulsivity and reactiveness. Thank you Julien Blanc. A supplement I’m too lazy to watch usually myself here. I wouldn’t be suprised if people look back at PUAs with the admiration afforded to social movements with the benefits of historic hindsight, who are reviled or ignored in their living prime.
Want to see the world’s most competed, battle tested diplomat in action? Here’s a video of him in an interview here: Interview: Dr Mohammad Javad Zarif, Iran’s Foreign Minister with ABC’s Chief Foreign Correspondent Philip Williams. He’s the consequence of being a career diplomat AND an academic THEN a politician.
The standard of evidence for cocoa butter’s efficacy on Wikipeida is citing Livestrong articles. They’re natural, so are an attractive lip balm option, but do they work?
Here’s an idea that’s before it’s time: A nightclub that plays music at a level that won’t cause permanent hearing damage...could go hand in hand with sober nightclubs …maybe even silent discos for talking friendly, individual tailoring and no noise pollution
Say this with me ‘I will cognitively reframe and restructure the knowledge of antecedents and determinants of negative, inadvertable consequences because cognitive behavioural therapy actually works.’
If it wasn’t, it would suffer from one of Empson’s 7 Types of Ambiguity. Now that I have a typology of ambiguity, I no longer feel uncomfortable by it.
Private insurance approaches to universal healthcare seem like the only universal healthcare policy formulation that doesn’t subsidise and therefore incentivise poor health decisions. Therefore, the primacy of my justice ethics would support that or non-universal health care policy formulations. However, I don’t know if evidence supports or opposes the execution of that perverse incentive in actual human behaviour and whether complex other factors (e.g increased productivity of the subsidised risk takers?) sufficiently compensates individuals who are making legitimate, egoistic decisions or better (prosocial). Anyone know what the evidence says, preferably with an indication of the strength of evidence so others evidence can be synthesised appropriately?
How do I work out whether an ethical duck farm is a profitable venture?
Say this with me ‘I will cognitively reframe and restructure the knowledge of antecedents and determinants of negative, inadvertable consequences because cognitive behavioural therapy actually works.’
I’m interested in things people might expect or seek reactions after disclosing information or asking a question. What kind of reaction are you expecting in response to whatever you comment to this reply?
Do you believe the affective fallacy is a legit fallacy? I don’t, but I think attitudes to the fallacy would be a good correlate of attitudes to my writing.
Strategically, do you think more like a naval admiral, or a pirate captain?
By taxing tobacco above the Ramsey rate up to Pigovian rates it is sacrificing government tax revenue (by cannibalising the elasticity of demand) for public health gains that can be gained in other ways (eg by tobacco licenses), but that wouldn’t that reduce demand too due to less consumption. That’s because even though tobacco tax revenue is high it doesn’t match the costs externalised on the health care system.
Counterintuitive relevant fact: Adam Smith support Pigovian taxes
Adam Smith. An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations, 1776i
Got the travel bug? Want a cure? Check this out
I recently almost asked someone if they had a strategy....for what amounted to the formulation fo their startup’s strategy, meta addiction diagnosed!
Maybe it’s because I’m compulsive. Maybe it’s because I’m clingy to motivational videos, maybe it’s because I’m a gambling addict. So, I’ve got off the hedonic treadmill. How? A mindblowing attitude adjustment on desire. This culls my impulsivity and reactiveness. Thank you Julien Blanc. A supplement I’m too lazy to watch usually myself here. I wouldn’t be suprised if people look back at PUAs with the admiration afforded to social movements with the benefits of historic hindsight, who are reviled or ignored in their living prime.
Want to see the world’s most competed, battle tested diplomat in action? Here’s a video of him in an interview here: Interview: Dr Mohammad Javad Zarif, Iran’s Foreign Minister with ABC’s Chief Foreign Correspondent Philip Williams. He’s the consequence of being a career diplomat AND an academic THEN a politician.
The standard of evidence for cocoa butter’s efficacy on Wikipeida is citing Livestrong articles. They’re natural, so are an attractive lip balm option, but do they work?
Here’s an idea that’s before it’s time: A nightclub that plays music at a level that won’t cause permanent hearing damage...could go hand in hand with sober nightclubs …maybe even silent discos for talking friendly, individual tailoring and no noise pollution
No
It’s a mouthful
If it wasn’t, it would suffer from one of Empson’s 7 Types of Ambiguity. Now that I have a typology of ambiguity, I no longer feel uncomfortable by it.