Although it should be noted that while this is usually a good idea, it doesn’t work on everyone and you should notice if your conversation partner doesn’t seem very enthusiastic about talking about themselves. (Yes, I do mean myself—not a big fan of vacuously discussing what I’m up to, most of the time.)
In this situation, what would you suggest for your would-be interlocutors? Would it be acceptable for them to make clear that the conversational ball is now in your court and be fine with nonconversation meanwhile?
Realistically? They’d start asking me how my things are going, and then I’d give some vague general comments and instead ask them how their things are going and then we’d talk about their things. Not sure what to do in the symmetrical case. Maybe try to find non-personal topics to discuss (e.g. books and other fiction, politics, anything else) with the major challenge being finding out which topics both people are interested in (and don’t disagree too much on).
Is anyone actually interested in the weather? I thought it was the stereotypical thing that people turn to when they can’t think of anything interesting to talk about.
It is the sterotypical thing to talk about, but the point is not the actual weather. It is signal that they would rather be talking to you than be silent. It’s an invitation to start a conversation, since people don’t routinely come up to you and say ‘I would like to being a conversation with you—please suggest a topic’. They say ‘Raining again!’ instead.
Also, talking about a shared experience is powerful, no matter what that experience is. Compare other generic conversation topics: if you both saw the same movie lately, or both watched [$SPORTS_EVENT], then that’s a shared experience. You can’t necessarily rely on the other person having seen the latest cultural whatsit, but you can be pretty sure they’ve experienced the weather.
I’m somewhat interested in the weather—it affects my quality of life.
One problem with being asked about one’s life—when some people do it, I feel like I’m being interrogated. I’ve got a friend who makes it feel like being interviewed by someone who’s got a friendly interest, but I’m don’t even have a theory about what creates the different effects.
I’ve got some ability to do small talk. What I’d like to be able to do is bet better at making a transition to more interesting topics.
Agreed! Regardless of the reason, pressing someone who wants to disengage is a Bad Thing.
(Although I’ll note that, if done right, this technique doesn’t have to be vacuous. The key is to let the other person guide the conversation towards the things they actually do care about. This takes practice, but it’s worth it. Interested people are interesting.)
Although it should be noted that while this is usually a good idea, it doesn’t work on everyone and you should notice if your conversation partner doesn’t seem very enthusiastic about talking about themselves. (Yes, I do mean myself—not a big fan of vacuously discussing what I’m up to, most of the time.)
In this situation, what would you suggest for your would-be interlocutors? Would it be acceptable for them to make clear that the conversational ball is now in your court and be fine with nonconversation meanwhile?
Realistically? They’d start asking me how my things are going, and then I’d give some vague general comments and instead ask them how their things are going and then we’d talk about their things. Not sure what to do in the symmetrical case. Maybe try to find non-personal topics to discuss (e.g. books and other fiction, politics, anything else) with the major challenge being finding out which topics both people are interested in (and don’t disagree too much on).
The stereotypical example of that is the weather.
Is anyone actually interested in the weather? I thought it was the stereotypical thing that people turn to when they can’t think of anything interesting to talk about.
It is the sterotypical thing to talk about, but the point is not the actual weather. It is signal that they would rather be talking to you than be silent. It’s an invitation to start a conversation, since people don’t routinely come up to you and say ‘I would like to being a conversation with you—please suggest a topic’. They say ‘Raining again!’ instead.
Also, talking about a shared experience is powerful, no matter what that experience is. Compare other generic conversation topics: if you both saw the same movie lately, or both watched [$SPORTS_EVENT], then that’s a shared experience. You can’t necessarily rely on the other person having seen the latest cultural whatsit, but you can be pretty sure they’ve experienced the weather.
I’m somewhat interested in the weather—it affects my quality of life.
One problem with being asked about one’s life—when some people do it, I feel like I’m being interrogated. I’ve got a friend who makes it feel like being interviewed by someone who’s got a friendly interest, but I’m don’t even have a theory about what creates the different effects.
I’ve got some ability to do small talk. What I’d like to be able to do is bet better at making a transition to more interesting topics.
Hmmmm. Challenge accepted.
Agreed! Regardless of the reason, pressing someone who wants to disengage is a Bad Thing.
(Although I’ll note that, if done right, this technique doesn’t have to be vacuous. The key is to let the other person guide the conversation towards the things they actually do care about. This takes practice, but it’s worth it. Interested people are interesting.)