Just you look at all that ugly anchoring at 2100...
And yet if people don’t round off at significant figures there are another bunch who will snub them for daring to provide precision they cannot justify.
In this case we can rebuke the stupid snubbers for not properly reading the question.
(But still, I’d like to ask whoever answered “28493” why they didn’t say 28492 or 28494 instead.)
Just you look at all that ugly anchoring at 2100...
And yet if people don’t round off at significant figures there are another bunch who will snub them for daring to provide precision they cannot justify.
In this case we can rebuke the stupid snubbers for not properly reading the question.
(But still, I’d like to ask whoever answered “28493” why they didn’t say 28492 or 28494 instead.)