Could you please redirect effort away from putdowns and into finding what was wrong with the reasoning in my previous comment?
Not a “putdown”. The whole idea looks like it needs major surgery to me—at least I can’t see much of interest in it as it stands. Think you can reformulate it so it makes sense? Be my guest.
Tim_Tyler claims that I know everything there is to know about the output of a program that spits out the integers from 1 to 100. [snip printer running out of ink]
“Know” should not be read as “know with certainty”. We don’t know anything with certainty. Anyway, such a criticism cuts against the original claim as well—since that contained “know” as well as “don’t know”.
Not a “putdown”. The whole idea looks like it needs major surgery to me—at least I can’t see much of interest in it as it stands. Think you can reformulate it so it makes sense? Be my guest.
“Know” should not be read as “know with certainty”. We don’t know anything with certainty. Anyway, such a criticism cuts against the original claim as well—since that contained “know” as well as “don’t know”.