I’m pretty sure it’s because nominally the article is a review of Harris’s Letter to a Christian nation—though, like many book reviews of the more intellectual sort, the book ostensibly being reviewed serves more as an excuse for the author to write about things he wants to write about than as an actual object of review.
I’m pretty sure it’s because nominally the article is a review of Harris’s Letter to a Christian nation—though, like many book reviews of the more intellectual sort, the book ostensibly being reviewed serves more as an excuse for the author to write about things he wants to write about than as an actual object of review.
Admittedly accurate. I was reading the letter and re-imagined Russell’s teapot thought experiment and thought I would share my source.