I hardly use Reddit, so I don’t know what is intended by the comparison with Reddit 2.0.
You are coming across to me as either a crank or a crackpot, and the “Manic” handle isn’t helping. I see no mathematics in what you have posted, and without mathematics, there is no physics. The theory, so far as it is saying definite things, gives no reasons for these particular things. Your insistence that neutrinos have not been detected is supported only by saying there may be other explanations for all the supposed detections, without giving any. This argument could be applied equally well to most of the known subatomic particles, including the gluons that you reply on.
The original post was a summary of the model, as it’s still in development and far from complete. That’s often the case with new models—they evolve over time. The gap between the Standard Model (SM) and the Dark Domain (DD) is as much philosophical as it is physical. The reasoning behind it is there, but in a summary, it might not come across as clearly as in a full, detailed presentation.
What I’m really looking for is feedback on the specifics within the model, rather than a critique of the overall presentation. I’m hoping to refine the model by addressing particular elements and ensuring they stand up to scrutiny.
Here’s a sample of some of the underlying mathematics:
Basic equation for photon-photon interaction energy:
E_γγ = ħ(ω₁ + ω₂) + E_Γ
Where:
E_γγ is the total energy from the photon-photon interaction,
ℏ is the reduced Planck constant,
ω1 and ω2 are the angular frequencies of the photons,
E_Γrepresents the energy contribution from the 1Γ gluon.
In the Γ Framework, Γ is the fundamental unit of energy that arises from photon-photon interactions. When we say:
Eγγ=Γ,
it means that the total energy from any photon interaction (E_γγ) simplifies to Γ, representing the baseline, unified energy state of the system. This makes Γ the key constant governing all photon and particle interactions, encapsulating the entire energy exchange in the framework.
Thus, Γ is both the result and the fundamental driver of all interactions.
I hardly use Reddit, so I don’t know what is intended by the comparison with Reddit 2.0.
You are coming across to me as either a crank or a crackpot, and the “Manic” handle isn’t helping. I see no mathematics in what you have posted, and without mathematics, there is no physics. The theory, so far as it is saying definite things, gives no reasons for these particular things. Your insistence that neutrinos have not been detected is supported only by saying there may be other explanations for all the supposed detections, without giving any. This argument could be applied equally well to most of the known subatomic particles, including the gluons that you reply on.
The original post was a summary of the model, as it’s still in development and far from complete. That’s often the case with new models—they evolve over time. The gap between the Standard Model (SM) and the Dark Domain (DD) is as much philosophical as it is physical. The reasoning behind it is there, but in a summary, it might not come across as clearly as in a full, detailed presentation.
What I’m really looking for is feedback on the specifics within the model, rather than a critique of the overall presentation. I’m hoping to refine the model by addressing particular elements and ensuring they stand up to scrutiny.
Here’s a sample of some of the underlying mathematics:
Basic equation for photon-photon interaction energy:
E_γγ = ħ(ω₁ + ω₂) + E_Γ
Where:
E_γγ is the total energy from the photon-photon interaction,
ℏ is the reduced Planck constant,
ω1 and ω2 are the angular frequencies of the photons,
E_Γrepresents the energy contribution from the 1Γ gluon.
In the Γ Framework, Γ is the fundamental unit of energy that arises from photon-photon interactions. When we say:
Eγγ=Γ,
it means that the total energy from any photon interaction (E_γγ) simplifies to Γ, representing the baseline, unified energy state of the system. This makes Γ the key constant governing all photon and particle interactions, encapsulating the entire energy exchange in the framework.
Thus, Γ is both the result and the fundamental driver of all interactions.