the original claim in the article was: “20-45-35 will open a lock set to 22-44-33”
Not as Aaron3 quoted it. (I guess EY has edited it since.)
I somehow missed the 33-44 transpose in the quote. That would indeed be a wide variance.
Not as Aaron3 quoted it. (I guess EY has edited it since.)
I somehow missed the 33-44 transpose in the quote. That would indeed be a wide variance.