Maybe I should read the first link too, but I just don’t expect to be able to ‘wade thru’ the vitriol to get at any ‘technical’ criticism.
I’ve read the other paper before and, IIRC, it was great criticism, but not inescapably ‘fatal’. I’ll try to reread it at some point.
There’s no vitirol except in the title. The review is excellent, as are most of that author’s reviews.
Maybe I should read the first link too, but I just don’t expect to be able to ‘wade thru’ the vitriol to get at any ‘technical’ criticism.
I’ve read the other paper before and, IIRC, it was great criticism, but not inescapably ‘fatal’. I’ll try to reread it at some point.
There’s no vitirol except in the title. The review is excellent, as are most of that author’s reviews.