There’s strong emergence and weak emergence. Strong emergence is nonsense, weak emergence is uncontroversial. See Holland’s book “Emergence”—which is pure reductionism, without a trace of idiotic new-age nonsense.
I usually take “emergence” to mean “weak emergence”—unless the context is one of ridicule, in which case “strong emergence” seems more appropriate.
There’s strong emergence and weak emergence. Strong emergence is nonsense, weak emergence is uncontroversial. See Holland’s book “Emergence”—which is pure reductionism, without a trace of idiotic new-age nonsense.
I usually take “emergence” to mean “weak emergence”—unless the context is one of ridicule, in which case “strong emergence” seems more appropriate.