Even the discussion of such risks could bring terrorist’s attention to areas they may not have otherwise looked at, even if there aren’t specific details.
Terrorists do not in general seek to destroy humanity so this isn’t a substantial worry. You don’t outside Tom Clancy books see terrorists trying to start nuclear wars or spread a virus that kills off the vast majority of the human population.
Yet, at least. Hypothetical example: I wonder if something like the Voluntary Human Extinction Movement will eventually switch out the “Voluntary” in favor of “Mandatory”. But that’s speculative, and you are right empirically.
Even the discussion of such risks could bring terrorist’s attention to areas they may not have otherwise looked at, even if there aren’t specific details.
Terrorists do not in general seek to destroy humanity so this isn’t a substantial worry. You don’t outside Tom Clancy books see terrorists trying to start nuclear wars or spread a virus that kills off the vast majority of the human population.
Yet, at least. Hypothetical example: I wonder if something like the Voluntary Human Extinction Movement will eventually switch out the “Voluntary” in favor of “Mandatory”. But that’s speculative, and you are right empirically.
The same is true for counter-terrorists.