A- That could be a barely acceptable way around it- what countries allow for ‘buying’ such protection for the rich?
B- It’s more that I can as a matter of principle- that I can defend my own property, rather than having to depend on the government.
C- By ‘practical social status’ I mean ‘social status relative to the people I normally have to deal with’. ‘Big fish in a small pond’ and all that.
D- That’s why I need high social status, or else sperm donation is useful. If the sperm are advertised as being from a high-status source, the chances of use increase. Sufficently high status, and I hit metaphorical jackpot.
A- That could be a barely acceptable way around it- what countries allow for ‘buying’ such protection for the rich? B- It’s more that I can as a matter of principle- that I can defend my own property, rather than having to depend on the government. C- By ‘practical social status’ I mean ‘social status relative to the people I normally have to deal with’. ‘Big fish in a small pond’ and all that. D- That’s why I need high social status, or else sperm donation is useful. If the sperm are advertised as being from a high-status source, the chances of use increase. Sufficently high status, and I hit metaphorical jackpot.
That was answered:
I meant other than the United States- Texas looks like a good option at this point, but I wanted to see if there were any others.
I think money can buy protection almost anywhere, e.g. donations to the right people.