I suppose we are now seeing the first stages of “Semiotic Warfare”—the art of achieving political goals through the manipulation of meaning itself. I think it’s a good idea, but I would advise against calling it “poison” because this framing implies you are attempting to injure the model. This is not the goal and I think such framing would prime for adversarial behavior.
I suppose we are now seeing the first stages of “Semiotic Warfare”—the art of achieving political goals through the manipulation of meaning itself. I think it’s a good idea, but I would advise against calling it “poison” because this framing implies you are attempting to injure the model. This is not the goal and I think such framing would prime for adversarial behavior.