I think I understand why frequentist-ism is clearly separated from bayesianism broadly speaking, but it also seems to me that in the absence of anything better, taking a frequency is not a bad way to get a starting point.
Is that common/accepted as part of bayesianism? Because if it’s not, I don’t know where priors would come from besides random allocation or evenly split between all hypotheses (which is problematic because there are many).
Sorry for the delayed replay. My comments are being held for review.
I think I understand why frequentist-ism is clearly separated from bayesianism broadly speaking, but it also seems to me that in the absence of anything better, taking a frequency is not a bad way to get a starting point.
Is that common/accepted as part of bayesianism? Because if it’s not, I don’t know where priors would come from besides random allocation or evenly split between all hypotheses (which is problematic because there are
Sorry for the delayed replay. My comments are being held for review.