But if that doesn’t justify the connection to you, then I don’t think I’m interpreting my intuitions into precise claims correctly, and so we won’t be able to do further evaluation of correctness of the intuitions I get from a difference I see between your post and that one, at least in this thread or until I can be more specific.
Alright. If you have further thoughts on the matter in the future, I’ll certainly be interested in reading them.
“of course” and “highly questionable” don’t hold in their syntax a statement of first person perspective
Correct, it is not a first person perspective, but rather a reference to an ongoing debate in philosophy (of course, you can guess which side of it I come down on…). This post originally having been a comment in a thread that mostly wasn’t about this specific point, I didn’t add any links to point a reader to references for this; I agree that this is a lacuna, and I’ll see about adding a clarifying link or two.
However, please note that the rest of the post does not depend on this point! Take a closer look at the paragraph beginning with “Let us consider again the belief”; as you see, the logic that I outline in the last part of the post is agnostic about whether beliefs are prior to decisions, or vice versa.
(You’re at least the second reader to find this unclear, which suggests that it could use a bit of an edit…)
(EDIT: Edited.)
a … request to update before processing the rest of the claims
Alright. If you have further thoughts on the matter in the future, I’ll certainly be interested in reading them.
Correct, it is not a first person perspective, but rather a reference to an ongoing debate in philosophy (of course, you can guess which side of it I come down on…). This post originally having been a comment in a thread that mostly wasn’t about this specific point, I didn’t add any links to point a reader to references for this; I agree that this is a lacuna, and I’ll see about adding a clarifying link or two.
However, please note that the rest of the post does not depend on this point! Take a closer look at the paragraph beginning with “Let us consider again the belief”; as you see, the logic that I outline in the last part of the post is agnostic about whether beliefs are prior to decisions, or vice versa.
(You’re at least the second reader to find this unclear, which suggests that it could use a bit of an edit…)
(EDIT: Edited.)
Please see this old comment for my stance on this.