What I’m proposing is a complementary, safety-oriented summary that extracts the parts of the AI Act that are most relevant to AI alignment researchers, interpretability work, and long-term governance thinkers.
It would include:
Provisions related to transparency, human oversight, and systemic risks.
Notes on how technical safety tools (e.g. interpretability, scalable oversight, evals) might interface with conformity assessments, or the compliance exemptions available for research work.
Commentary on loopholes or compliance dynamics that could shape industry behavior.
What the Act doesn’t currently address from a frontier risk or misalignment perspective.
Target length: 3–5 pages, written for technical researchers and governance folks who want signal without wading through dense regulation.
If this sounds useful, I’d love to hear what you’d want to see included, or what use cases would make it most actionable.
And if you think this is a bad idea, no worries. Just please don’t downvote me into oblivion, I just got to decent karma :).
Would a safety-focused breakdown of the EU AI Act be useful to you?
The Future of Life Institute published a great high-level summary of the EU AI Act here: https://artificialintelligenceact.eu/high-level-summary/
What I’m proposing is a complementary, safety-oriented summary that extracts the parts of the AI Act that are most relevant to AI alignment researchers, interpretability work, and long-term governance thinkers.
It would include:
Provisions related to transparency, human oversight, and systemic risks.
Notes on how technical safety tools (e.g. interpretability, scalable oversight, evals) might interface with conformity assessments, or the compliance exemptions available for research work.
Commentary on loopholes or compliance dynamics that could shape industry behavior.
What the Act doesn’t currently address from a frontier risk or misalignment perspective.
Target length: 3–5 pages, written for technical researchers and governance folks who want signal without wading through dense regulation.
If this sounds useful, I’d love to hear what you’d want to see included, or what use cases would make it most actionable.
And if you think this is a bad idea, no worries. Just please don’t downvote me into oblivion, I just got to decent karma :).
Thanks in advance for the feebdack!
I guess this should wait for the final draft of the GPAI Code of Practice to be released?
I’ll try to make it as helpful as possible so, yes. But I thought I’d gather feedback from now ☺️.