I agree that it is important to detect and fix bad things that happen in the community.
I think though that such situations can be handled by a handful of leaders/moderators as opposed to thousands and thousands of people who visit LessWrong. It sounds like you agree with this.
Relatedly, we agree that we can’t rely on few people having this power without having some sort of checks on that power.
I also think that it has a net negative impact for most non leaders/moderators to invest more than a few minutes into this. I’m not clear on whether or not you agree with this, but I’d bet that you agree.
I suspect that we don’t disagree.
I agree that it is important to detect and fix bad things that happen in the community.
I think though that such situations can be handled by a handful of leaders/moderators as opposed to thousands and thousands of people who visit LessWrong. It sounds like you agree with this.
Relatedly, we agree that we can’t rely on few people having this power without having some sort of checks on that power.
I also think that it has a net negative impact for most non leaders/moderators to invest more than a few minutes into this. I’m not clear on whether or not you agree with this, but I’d bet that you agree.