If they weren’t ready to deploy these safeguards and thought that proceeding outweighed the (expected) cost in human lives, they should have publicly acknowledged the level of fatalities and explained why they thought weakening their safety policies and incurring these expected fatalities was net good.
I can’t imagine their legal team signing off on such a statement. Even if the benefits of releasing clearly outweigh the costs.
I can’t imagine their legal team signing off on such a statement. Even if the benefits of releasing clearly outweigh the costs.