Perhaps you think of intelligence as just raw IQ. I count persuasion as a part of intelligence. After all, if someone can’t put two coherent sentences together, they won’t be very persuasive. Obviously being able to solve math/logic problems and being persuasive are very different things, but again, I count both as “intelligence”.
Of course, El Chapo had money (to bribe prison guards), which a “boxed” AGI won’t have, that I agree with. I disagree that it will make a big difference.
I intentionally avoided as much as possible the implication that intelligence is “only” raw IQ. But if intelligence is not on some kind of real-valued scale, what does any part of this post mean?
Perhaps you think of intelligence as just raw IQ. I count persuasion as a part of intelligence. After all, if someone can’t put two coherent sentences together, they won’t be very persuasive. Obviously being able to solve math/logic problems and being persuasive are very different things, but again, I count both as “intelligence”.
Of course, El Chapo had money (to bribe prison guards), which a “boxed” AGI won’t have, that I agree with. I disagree that it will make a big difference.
I intentionally avoided as much as possible the implication that intelligence is “only” raw IQ. But if intelligence is not on some kind of real-valued scale, what does any part of this post mean?