On the question of what voluntary transaction you engage in with your money, libertarianism is silent (I’m pretty sure the Libertarian party is as well).
Hitler did think he was helping people. He thought the Jews were out to get him and immisserate mankind, the end result in his vision was world peace. We usually think of him as evil-for-evils-sake because we fought a large succesful war against him.
Mackie’s Error sounds odd to me. How can a meaningless statement be false? If I said “Overcoming Bias is scrumtrulescent!”, is that false?
On the question of what voluntary transaction you engage in with your money, libertarianism is silent (I’m pretty sure the Libertarian party is as well).
Hitler did think he was helping people. He thought the Jews were out to get him and immisserate mankind, the end result in his vision was world peace. We usually think of him as evil-for-evils-sake because we fought a large succesful war against him.
Mackie’s Error sounds odd to me. How can a meaningless statement be false? If I said “Overcoming Bias is scrumtrulescent!”, is that false?