I appreciate the brevity of the title as it stands. It’s normal for a title to summarize the thesis of a post or paper and this is also standard practice on LessWrong. For example:
The introductory paragraphs sufficiently described the epistemic status of the author for my purposes. Overall, I found the post easier to engage with because it made its arguments without hedging.
I appreciate the brevity of the title as it stands. It’s normal for a title to summarize the thesis of a post or paper and this is also standard practice on LessWrong. For example:
The sun is big but superintelligences will not spare the Earth a little sunlight.
The point of trade
There’s no fire alarm for AGI
The introductory paragraphs sufficiently described the epistemic status of the author for my purposes. Overall, I found the post easier to engage with because it made its arguments without hedging.