Please don’t get clever with unicode in the post title.
Is that a general LessWrong rule? If so then :-(
You can use unicode for reasonable things where the unicode is actually doing something useful (but not “make it attention-grabbing in ways that are zero-sum/clickbait-y”).
Is that a general LessWrong rule? If so then :-(
You can use unicode for reasonable things where the unicode is actually doing something useful (but not “make it attention-grabbing in ways that are zero-sum/clickbait-y”).