I am increasingly having trouble discerning AI writing from human writing in the past year. It went from glaringly obvious to being possible to miss even if I put in effort analysing. I feel worried.
Edit: Yes, I know some, maybe most of you, can still smell out LLMs accurately, but I am getting worse at it.
It looks like we will soon enter a world where we have to lean into author reputation to separate the wheat from the chaff. And if you lack a reputation, well...
STEM people used to laugh at humanities’ response to Sokal affair (can’ separate wheat from chaff reliably, to avoid further embarrassment let’s rely on reputation), and now it returned to bite them.
I am increasingly having trouble discerning AI writing from human writing in the past year. It went from glaringly obvious to being possible to miss even if I put in effort analysing. I feel worried.
Edit: Yes, I know some, maybe most of you, can still smell out LLMs accurately, but I am getting worse at it.
prompted by this article, which is fully AI generated according to Pangram
It looks like we will soon enter a world where we have to lean into author reputation to separate the wheat from the chaff. And if you lack a reputation, well...
STEM people used to laugh at humanities’ response to Sokal affair (can’ separate wheat from chaff reliably, to avoid further embarrassment let’s rely on reputation), and now it returned to bite them.