I don’t understand my proposal as related to signaling at all
What’s the good reason to care about whether EY’s salary is calibrated to the market rate, rather than/independent from whether it’s too low or high for this particular situation?
it’s about measuring EY’s (and others’) effectiveness, rather than taking it for granted.
I don’t understand why SI (i.e., its board) shouldn’t employ EY and MV full-time and continually evaluate the effectiveness of their work for it, like any other organization in the world would do.
What’s the good reason to care about whether EY’s salary is calibrated to the market rate, rather than/independent from whether it’s too low or high for this particular situation?
I don’t understand why SI (i.e., its board) shouldn’t employ EY and MV full-time and continually evaluate the effectiveness of their work for it, like any other organization in the world would do.