Looking at the code concerning this, “three” isn’t hard-coded, it’s calculated but the formula is a bit hairy and relies on cache, so there could be a bug somewhere.
Or it could be a coincidence :)
Looking at the code concerning this, “three” isn’t hard-coded, it’s calculated but the formula is a bit hairy and relies on cache, so there could be a bug somewhere.
Or it could be a coincidence :)