So, the case you are apparently attempting to make is that all resources that could be spent on asteroid deflecting would be better spent on other things. Maybe—but that is far-from obvious. Here is what is currently happening:
I’m not attempting to make that case—at some point (sufficiently low amount of resources) marginal worth of asteroid-avoidance might become competitive.
Right—OK—that’s what I was saying. Some people are space cadets—and I figure some of them can probably make useful contributions.
Space has some other possibilities for reducing risks too. For example, communications satellites network the world, make everyone friends—and reduce the chances of war. Of course there’s also star wars—but I don’t think that space can be simply written off as not helping.
So, the case you are apparently attempting to make is that all resources that could be spent on asteroid deflecting would be better spent on other things. Maybe—but that is far-from obvious. Here is what is currently happening:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asteroid_impact_avoidance
I’m not attempting to make that case—at some point (sufficiently low amount of resources) marginal worth of asteroid-avoidance might become competitive.
Right—OK—that’s what I was saying. Some people are space cadets—and I figure some of them can probably make useful contributions.
Space has some other possibilities for reducing risks too. For example, communications satellites network the world, make everyone friends—and reduce the chances of war. Of course there’s also star wars—but I don’t think that space can be simply written off as not helping.