Here’s my pet idea: the primary cognitive bias affecting this blog’s community lies in underestimating the limits to reductionist explanation.
This is how you end up with statements like “X is not about Y (X is about Z)” even when X is pretty clearly more about Y than about Z (although the world in general may tend to downplay the extent to which X is about Z).
Here’s my pet idea: the primary cognitive bias affecting this blog’s community lies in underestimating the limits to reductionist explanation.
This is how you end up with statements like “X is not about Y (X is about Z)” even when X is pretty clearly more about Y than about Z (although the world in general may tend to downplay the extent to which X is about Z).