Your “strong/weak scientific” distinction sounds like it’s more about determinism than reductionism.
According to your definitions, I’m a “strong ontological reductionist”, and “weak scientific reductionist” because I have no problem with quantum mechanics and MWI being true.
Since there is no handy toll to create polls on LW
I often see polls in comments—“upvote this comment if you choose A”, “upvote this if you choose B”, “downvote this for karma balance”. Asking for replies probably gives you less answers but more accuracy.
Your “strong/weak scientific” distinction sounds like it’s more about determinism than reductionism.
According to your definitions, I’m a “strong ontological reductionist”, and “weak scientific reductionist” because I have no problem with quantum mechanics and MWI being true.
I often see polls in comments—“upvote this comment if you choose A”, “upvote this if you choose B”, “downvote this for karma balance”. Asking for replies probably gives you less answers but more accuracy.