I tried to work out if someone had already said this, but I don’t have ⌘F to expand and search. Apologies if it’s a duplicate.
I do not think that the following is a fair analogy:
The scientific establishment is too busy with their washing machines to think about light bulbs or computers.
I think that the acual situation is:
the scientific establishment is an establishment
it depends on its continuing social license in order to operate
it does not want to be blamed for expensive health technologies that cannot be applied to already existing people who are frightened of death and/or inadequate healthcare
The Meisian answer is creative destruction. What past political-economic shifts have many people embraced, and why?
I tried to work out if someone had already said this, but I don’t have ⌘F to expand and search. Apologies if it’s a duplicate.
I do not think that the following is a fair analogy:
I think that the acual situation is:
the scientific establishment is an establishment
it depends on its continuing social license in order to operate
it does not want to be blamed for expensive health technologies that cannot be applied to already existing people who are frightened of death and/or inadequate healthcare
The Meisian answer is creative destruction. What past political-economic shifts have many people embraced, and why?