That’s a great link—thanks! That puzzle puzzled me for years, ever since I read about some EPR experiments in Scientific American as a kid, and wondered why they didn’t just tweak the experiment a bit to make it actually interesting. That paper is the best explanation I’ve seen by far.
Hal Finney: ”...at the time I discovered an analysis of a related idea at http://www.flownet.com/gat/QM.pdf″.
That’s a great link—thanks! That puzzle puzzled me for years, ever since I read about some EPR experiments in Scientific American as a kid, and wondered why they didn’t just tweak the experiment a bit to make it actually interesting. That paper is the best explanation I’ve seen by far.