While I agree with your argument against Searle, it matters whether it’s at all feasible because if it isn’t, then the argument Searle is using has no real relation to AI today or in the future, and therefore we can’t use it to argue against the hypothesis that they lack intelligence/consciousness.
To be clear, I agree with your argument. I just want to note that physical impossibilities are being used to argue that today’s AI aren’t intelligent or conscious.
While I agree with your argument against Searle, it matters whether it’s at all feasible because if it isn’t, then the argument Searle is using has no real relation to AI today or in the future, and therefore we can’t use it to argue against the hypothesis that they lack intelligence/consciousness.
To be clear, I agree with your argument. I just want to note that physical impossibilities are being used to argue that today’s AI aren’t intelligent or conscious.