I don’t see the difference between this usage and Zack’s/Eliezer’s: the definition given in the SEP link is:
Moral luck occurs when an agent can be correctly treated as an object of moral judgment despite the fact that a significant aspect of what she is assessed for depends on factors beyond her control.
A situation where all of an agent’s options are blameworthy seems quite clearly to fall within this category.
OK, I suppose it counts as an instance, though I’m not convinced Eliezer intended the phrase in that sense. But it’s certainly one of the instances I’m less interested in.
I don’t see the difference between this usage and Zack’s/Eliezer’s: the definition given in the SEP link is:
A situation where all of an agent’s options are blameworthy seems quite clearly to fall within this category.
OK, I suppose it counts as an instance, though I’m not convinced Eliezer intended the phrase in that sense. But it’s certainly one of the instances I’m less interested in.
Agreed.