That’s not excuse for not providing a meaningful summary so that others can gauge whether it’s worth their time. You need to give more than “Vladimir says so” as a reason for judging the paper worthwhile.
You … do … understand the paper well enough to provide such a summary … RIGHT?
I was linking not just to the paper, but to a summary of the paper, and included that example out of that summary, a summary-of-summary. Others have already summarized what you got wrong in your reply. You can see that the paper has about 1300 citations, which should count for its importance.
That’s not excuse for not providing a meaningful summary so that others can gauge whether it’s worth their time. You need to give more than “Vladimir says so” as a reason for judging the paper worthwhile.
You … do … understand the paper well enough to provide such a summary … RIGHT?
I was linking not just to the paper, but to a summary of the paper, and included that example out of that summary, a summary-of-summary. Others have already summarized what you got wrong in your reply. You can see that the paper has about 1300 citations, which should count for its importance.