No. I asserted that...
Fair enough.
This might be a good idea… At this point, the “hedonic impact” of this mechanic will almost disappear.
I don’t disagree with this. My scenario is premised on the reward being a surprise, so it implicitly assumes one-time use, or at least no overuse.
Fair enough.
I don’t disagree with this. My scenario is premised on the reward being a surprise, so it implicitly assumes one-time use, or at least no overuse.