No because, like, for example, you can ask followup questions of a human, and they’ll give outputs that come from the result of thinking humanly, which includes processes LLMs currently can’t do.
While an LLM can respond “Artificially Intelligently”, which includes processes humans can’t currently perform, at least to the same degree. If your definition of testimony includes an aspect of humanity, then the claim that only humans are capable of producing it is almost a tautology.
No because, like, for example, you can ask followup questions of a human, and they’ll give outputs that come from the result of thinking humanly, which includes processes LLMs currently can’t do.
While an LLM can respond “Artificially Intelligently”, which includes processes humans can’t currently perform, at least to the same degree. If your definition of testimony includes an aspect of humanity, then the claim that only humans are capable of producing it is almost a tautology.