Definitely relevant, but not sure if it supports my argument that we shouldn’t try to induce collapse.
This post is about unilaterally taking a very radical action to avert a potentially worse scenario that inertia and race dynamics are pushing us towards. That looks like classic ‘unilateralist’s benediction’ territory.
What ofer’s saying is that collapse plans are probably a unilateralist curse, since one agent is taking dangerous decisions on their own, because one agent perceives the benefit to be high relative to risk.
Definitely relevant, but not sure if it supports my argument that we shouldn’t try to induce collapse.
This post is about unilaterally taking a very radical action to avert a potentially worse scenario that inertia and race dynamics are pushing us towards. That looks like classic ‘unilateralist’s benediction’ territory.
What ofer’s saying is that collapse plans are probably a unilateralist curse, since one agent is taking dangerous decisions on their own, because one agent perceives the benefit to be high relative to risk.