The paper is careful to describe the models as “open to the research community”, and the model card describes the model license as “Non-commercial bespoke license”, which per the Open Source Definition (6) is not open source.
There’s been a lot of confusion—including from Yann LeCun—but while the code is open source the models are not.
The paper is careful to describe the models as “open to the research community”, and the model card describes the model license as “Non-commercial bespoke license”, which per the Open Source Definition (6) is not open source.
There’s been a lot of confusion—including from Yann LeCun—but while the code is open source the models are not.
Yep! That’s a good clarification. I tried to make this clear in my footnote and the quotation marks, but I think I should’ve stated it more clearly.