Fair enough. The idea of calling QM ‘frequentist’ really stretches the reason for using that term under anything but an explicit collapse interpretation. Maybe it would be more of a third way -
Frequentism would be that the world is itself stochastic.
Fractionism would be that the world takes both paths and we will find ourselves in one.
Fair enough. The idea of calling QM ‘frequentist’ really stretches the reason for using that term under anything but an explicit collapse interpretation. Maybe it would be more of a third way -
Frequentism would be that the world is itself stochastic.
Fractionism would be that the world takes both paths and we will find ourselves in one.
Bayes gets to keep its definition.