I think a better way of rephrasing it is “clever schemes have too many moving parts and make too many assumptions and each assumption we make is a potential weakness an intelligent adversary can and will optimize for”.
i would love a world-saving-plan that isn’t “a clever scheme” with “many moving parts” but alas i don’t expect it’s what we get. as clever schemes with many moving parts go, this one seems not particularly complex compared to other things i’ve heard of.
I think a better way of rephrasing it is “clever schemes have too many moving parts and make too many assumptions and each assumption we make is a potential weakness an intelligent adversary can and will optimize for”.
i would love a world-saving-plan that isn’t “a clever scheme” with “many moving parts” but alas i don’t expect it’s what we get. as clever schemes with many moving parts go, this one seems not particularly complex compared to other things i’ve heard of.