Absence of consensus does not imply absence of objective truth
Correct, but that doesn’t bear on my claim. Moral disagreements exist, whether or not there’s objective moral truth.
i don’t know about “necessary” but “they’re smarter” is possible and reasonably likely.
It’s possible, but I don’t know any convincing arguments for why it’s likely, while I can think of plausibility arguments for why it’s unlikely.
Correct, but that doesn’t bear on my claim. Moral disagreements exist, whether or not there’s objective moral truth.
It’s possible, but I don’t know any convincing arguments for why it’s likely, while I can think of plausibility arguments for why it’s unlikely.