Did you read the paper? It does cite Hume.
In fact, it spends most of it’s time arguing that Hume isn’t needed for the argument to work...
I did not yet; thank you for the link.
Did you read the paper? It does cite Hume.
In fact, it spends most of it’s time arguing that Hume isn’t needed for the argument to work...
I did not yet; thank you for the link.