Noted! Will check out the comments later.(I did discuss earlier versions of this argument at least a few years ago, so at least I’m confident I couldn’t have been subconsciously influenced by that thread specifically!)
(EDIT: Upon a skim they discuss a pretty different set of considerations here, closer to what Hamming calls “You see what you look for”)
It doesn’t seem to be the same as your argument.
Noted! Will check out the comments later.
(I did discuss earlier versions of this argument at least a few years ago, so at least I’m confident I couldn’t have been subconsciously influenced by that thread specifically!)
(EDIT: Upon a skim they discuss a pretty different set of considerations here, closer to what Hamming calls “You see what you look for”)
It doesn’t seem to be the same as your argument.