It might not be intended this way but the discussion being centered around domestic surveillance of Americans does have a possible implication that foreign communications are already being covered by Claude without protest from Anthropic. If that’s the case then attempts by the government to turn it domestic shouldn’t be much of a surprise to them IMO.
It might not be intended this way but the discussion being centered around domestic surveillance of Americans does have a possible implication that foreign communications are already being covered by Claude without protest from Anthropic. If that’s the case then attempts by the government to turn it domestic shouldn’t be much of a surprise to them IMO.
Post-9/11 laws provide NSA a legal authority to access messages of foreign users on American servers (see, for example, https://www.aclu.org/issues/national-security/privacy-and-surveillance/nsa-surveillance), so that shouldn’t come as a surprise. But the domestic surveillance was limited by courts around the 1960s IIRC