Maybe we could just go burn some elementary-school textbooks, because they often contain too simplified information. Sometimes with silly pictures!
Did you ever read about Feynman’s experience reading science textbooks for elementary school? (It’s available online here.)
There are good and bad ways to simplify.
This is why I wrote about “the low-hanging fruit that most rationalists wouldn’t even touch for… let’s admit it… status reasons”.
Sure, there are people I’d rather not join the LessWrong community for status reasons. But I don’t think the resistance here is about status instead of methodology. Yes, it would be nice to have organizations devoted to helping people get from level 1 to level 2, but if you were closing your eyes and designing such an organization, would it look like this?
Did you ever read about Feynman’s experience reading science textbooks for elementary school? (It’s available online here.)
There are good and bad ways to simplify.
Sure, there are people I’d rather not join the LessWrong community for status reasons. But I don’t think the resistance here is about status instead of methodology. Yes, it would be nice to have organizations devoted to helping people get from level 1 to level 2, but if you were closing your eyes and designing such an organization, would it look like this?