My writing skills are also lacking but I’ll give it a shot…
Does the start of a new sequence present a way around this for that sequence’s content?
The publishing of a sequence with new material may present an opportunity to perform rationality tests without the aforementioned difficulties.
The necessity and viability of having additional experimental controls, like a control group that just reports the measures, without reading the sequence will vary between sequences. But I think we will generally be fine with a simple before and after picture.
Whether additional experimental controls are necessary and/or viable will vary between sequences. For example, a control group could report their measurements without reading the sequence. Regardless, I think it is generally adequate to simply compare individual’s measurements from before and after reading the sequence.
I guess I invoke Crocker’s rules as well. Although, I think my sentences may be even worse…
The necessity and viability of having additional experimental controls will vary between sequences. For example, we could use a control group that doesn’t read the sequence, or reads an alternate version while still filling out the same measures. But I think we will generally be fine with a simple before and after picture.
To a new version of my own. Also considered changing it to:
The necessity and viability of having additional experimental controls will vary between sequences. For example, we could use a control group that doesn’t read the sequence, or reads an alternate version while still filling out the same measures. But I think we will generally be fine with a simple before and after picture.
My writing skills are also lacking but I’ll give it a shot…
The publishing of a sequence with new material may present an opportunity to perform rationality tests without the aforementioned difficulties.
Whether additional experimental controls are necessary and/or viable will vary between sequences. For example, a control group could report their measurements without reading the sequence. Regardless, I think it is generally adequate to simply compare individual’s measurements from before and after reading the sequence.
I guess I invoke Crocker’s rules as well. Although, I think my sentences may be even worse…
Changed
To a new version of my own. Also considered changing it to:
Any advice on which is better?