I don’t think using likelihoods when publishing in journals is tractable.
Where did your priors come from? What if other scientists have different priors? Justifying the chosen prior seems difficult.
Where did your likelihood ratios come from? What if other scientists disagree.
P values may bave been a failed attempt at objectivity, but they’re a better attempt than moving towards subjective probabilities (even though the latter is more correct).
I don’t think using likelihoods when publishing in journals is tractable.
Where did your priors come from? What if other scientists have different priors? Justifying the chosen prior seems difficult.
Where did your likelihood ratios come from? What if other scientists disagree.
P values may bave been a failed attempt at objectivity, but they’re a better attempt than moving towards subjective probabilities (even though the latter is more correct).