That is not a specification, it is a supposition. It is the same supposition CDT makes (rejection of backwards causality) and leads to the same result of not playing Newcomb.
It’s like playing chess and saying “dude, my rook can go diagonal, too!”
At that point, you’re not playing chess anymore.
That is not a specification, it is a supposition. It is the same supposition CDT makes (rejection of backwards causality) and leads to the same result of not playing Newcomb.
It’s like playing chess and saying “dude, my rook can go diagonal, too!”
At that point, you’re not playing chess anymore.