Thus, there can be a combinatorial explosion in actual opportunities for each extra capability acquired. Sticking with the bike example, suppose you also know how to drive a car and own a car; suppose your car can carry your bike; suppose you have good fitness; and suppose you have access to wilderness. Now, you can take your bike to the wilderness and bike around and enjoy the nature. This capability in turn allows a great new mode of socialization.
You have here five additional “suppose thats” for two extra “allows”. I suggest that this is not a good example of a combinatorial explosion.
Point taken, thanks. I hope that the main point is clear though. The “suppose thats” that I’ve assumed allow for much more than these two additional “allows” that I’ve stated. But yes, the example could’ve been better.
You have here five additional “suppose thats” for two extra “allows”. I suggest that this is not a good example of a combinatorial explosion.
Point taken, thanks. I hope that the main point is clear though. The “suppose thats” that I’ve assumed allow for much more than these two additional “allows” that I’ve stated. But yes, the example could’ve been better.