As I am agreeing with your confusion I want to extend the question to why Eliezer’s writing is seen as so great in general. For me it is just exhausting to read, especially since most of the articles can be summarised in a couple of sentences.
I’d be happy to see you do this. Maybe when we see what you think the two sentence version of every article is it’ll be easy to talk about why you don’t like what eliezer is doing.
That would require me reading all of the articles. We could meet at a middle ground with me trying to rewrite one of the smaller subsequences, like a handful of articles, and us evaluating the merits of this approach. Do you have any preferences?
As I am agreeing with your confusion I want to extend the question to why Eliezer’s writing is seen as so great in general. For me it is just exhausting to read, especially since most of the articles can be summarised in a couple of sentences.
I’d be happy to see you do this. Maybe when we see what you think the two sentence version of every article is it’ll be easy to talk about why you don’t like what eliezer is doing.
That would require me reading all of the articles. We could meet at a middle ground with me trying to rewrite one of the smaller subsequences, like a handful of articles, and us evaluating the merits of this approach. Do you have any preferences?
Haven’t you already read them if you know that they can be summarized in two sentences?